this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
301 points (92.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27342 readers
1912 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rules: explain why

Ready player one.

That has to be one of the cringiest movies I've seen, is tries so hard, too hard with it's "WE LOVE YOU NERD, YOU'RE SO COOL FOR PLAYING GAMES AND GETTING THIS 80S REFERENCE" message and the whole "corporation bad, the people good" narrative seems written for toddlers... The fan service feels cheap and adds nothing to the story.

Finally, they trying to make the people believe that very attractive girl with a barely visible red tint spot on her face is "ugly"... Like wtf?

Yet it received decent reviews plus being one of the most successful movies of that year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

JK Rowling holds a very common position amongst older feminists and really doesn't deserve the constant rape threats for funding women's refuges. I'm pushing back on the party line here, and no, I don't believe trans people deserve to be killed, or any bullshit like that. I promise to hide them in my non-existent attic if it comes to that.

Edit: the books did get progressively worse after the third or possibly fourth one, though, and the films aren't very good.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Her or her friends are running those charities. It's a way to hide money from tax collectors.

Looking back with adult eyes, her books push a very pro-Class based society. That's why nothing ever changes.

Edit: The books got progressively worse because JK wrangled more and more control away from her editor.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure about the ownership of foundations, charitable funds and the like; some degree of corruption wouldn't surprise me unfortunately.

I will say that she won't have been deliberately pushing class-stratification given her socioeconomic background, however the whole setting is heavily influenced by Victorian-era children's novels about boarding school adventures which were absolutely saturated with classism.

They surely needed a team of editors towards the end.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JK was never poor. Her "homelessness" was couch surfing between friend's houses in Edinburgh.

If she didn't approve of the class system, then why was the sorting hat never wrong? Having kids switch houses between school years would have been an easy to to signal character development for a younger audience. Her class system is depicted as shitty, but something you just have to accept as true and deal with to become stronger. Look at how they treat the one character to oppose slavery. Even our MC, who's an outsider to the wizard world thinks it's weird to be opposed to slavery.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you've clearly made your mind up.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I just did a poo.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

It being common does not make it ok. If she were just quietly anti-trans in her personal life that might be something we could overlook. But she is proudly and actively hateful towards trans people. She ignores the fact that trans women are even more likely than cis women to be victims of gender-based violence and pretends that trans women are actually predators. And she engages in bullshit "transvestigating", drumming up witch hunts against butch cis women. She is actively causing harm against women, including the cis women she claims to want to protect. She’s a terrorist using stochastic methods.