this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
88 points (95.8% liked)

Nintendo

18553 readers
4 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Please don’t support Nintendo. They have been super aggressive with lawsuits. They should go after people doing illegal things, but the palworld stuff and dmca people streaming games is pretty bad.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As long as Nintendo continues to support a physical format, I'm going to buy a Switch 2 and games for it. You're free to make a personal decision about whether to support a company or not; everyone has to make their own purchasing decisions based on their values and priorities. I don't support many companies that you probably do support, some that you may not even give a second thought to. Palworld, for me, doesn't rank.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess we've lost this battle, but down vote is not for disagreement. This comment provides an on-topic opinion and suggestion in a polite way, without any hate speech or trying to start a flame war.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It was never a winnable war. It's something that is completely unenforceable and will always be up to the individual. It would be wise to accept that votes will always be arbitrary and capricious.

The good news is that on Lemmy, they don't matter.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No company is perfect. The only thing bad enough to boycott here is modern Pokemon games, until those devs learn how to code properly.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Seems they learnt a fair bit by the time they did Scarlet/Violet or were there problems with those as well?

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

SV was the worst yet. It runs like a N64

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Feels like they were going for more pokemon on screen rather than high framerates to me, but the days of hyper optimisation like we saw on the PS2/PS3 are gone for most companies.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Eh? Where's the line exactly? I'd much sooner boycott a company because they're causing genuine damage with ridiculous lawsuits, than because they make bad games.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

dmca people streaming games is pretty bad.

I agree but technically they are in the right. Technically game streaming is likely illegal and breaks copyright. It's commonly accepted and often encouraged by most companies though.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah. Not in the Palworld thing. They applied for those patents after Palworld was already being produced and sold as an excuse to sue the company and the fact that the law allows this is bogus. That being said, boycott if you want, or don't. That's your business.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't comment on the palworld thing.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You responded to a comment directly about the Palworld thing.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I directly cited the portion to which I replied too.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm buying a launch console to not play for future hacks for ~~piracy~~ Linux ISOs. Considering they sell consoles at a loss, this is even more effective

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

That works be my only consideration. First batch consoles are typically the ones that get hacked first.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Consoles are not universally sold at a loss. Among the notable exceptions is the Nintendo Switch...

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What? It isn't about that at all.

It is about then filing a patent in 2021 for "aiming and throwing an item to capture a character". Something that had been done in RPGs for decades. And they bribed enough officials in Japan to get it approved 1 month before palworld came out.

Then they used the full might of Nintendo legal bribery and lawyers to try to crush indie developers that dare make their "style" of game (which they have been floundering for a decade) better than they do.

Not to mention that they use threats to shut down completely legal emulation software that they themselves steal and use after refusing to preserve old games themselves.