this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
245 points (97.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32743 readers
677 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 94 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Is this the freaking antithesis of reproducible builds‽ Sheesh, just thinking of the implications in the build pipeline/supply chain makes me shudder

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 38 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just set the temperature to zero, duh

[–] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When your CPU is at 0 degrees Kelvin, nothing unpredictable can happen.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

>cool CPU to 0 Kelvin

>CPU stops working

yeah I guess you're right

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

CPUs work faster with better cooling.
So at 0K they are infinitely fast.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

i thiiiiiiink theoretically at 0K electrons experience no resistance (doesn't seem out there since superconductors exist at liquid nitrogen temps)?
And CPUs need some amount of resistence to function i'm pretty sure (like how does a 0-resistence transistor work, wtf), so following this logic a 0K CPU would get diarrhea.

[–] Finadil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Looking at the source they thankfully already use a temp of zero, but max tokens is 320. That doesn't seem like much for code especially since most symbols are a whole token.

[–] groet@feddit.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

Just hash the binary and include it with the build. When somebody else compiles they can check the hash and just recompile until it is the same. Deterministic outcome in presumambly finite time. Untill the weights of the model change then all bets are off.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

this is how we end up with lost tech a few decades later

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You'd have to consider it somewhat of a black box, which is what people already do.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

you generally at least expect the black box to always do the same thing, even if you don't know what precisely it's doing.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

someone post this to the guix mailinglist 😄