this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
1490 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

11426 readers
1489 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

science makes me have faith in science.

Science is unironically one of the only things i ever trust because truth prevails, always...

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Science research on the one hand is cursed to follow the money.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My own experience leaves me a bit more optimistic, although I do see some cursed bits.

The presence of money in research depends greatly on the field and the ability of the scientists to make their research sound sexy. You can mask a lot of wierd niche basic research topics with sexy applied research talk.

Also, there's still a lot of science research without much money, being sustained by sheer enthusiasm.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

I agree. A great example of why can be found in this excellent article about an extensive "dossier" of fraud allegations against a top Alzheimer's researcher: (https://www.science.org/content/article/research-misconduct-finding-neuroscientist-eliezer-masliah-papers-under-suspicion)

Specifically, this snippet:

"Microbiologist and research integrity expert Elisabeth Bik, who also worked on the Zlokovic dossier, contributed other Masliah examples and reviewed and concurred with almost all of the findings."

Elisabeth Bik is someone who has an incredible eye for fraudulently edited Western Blots images and someone I greatly admire. Calling her a "research integrity expert" is accurate, but what I find neat is that (to my knowledge) she doesn't have any particular training or funding towards this work. A lot of work she does in this area starts on, or is made public on PubPeer, an online forum. This is all to say that Elisabeth Bik's expertise and reputation in this area effectively stems from her just being a nerd on the internet.

I find it quite beautiful in a way, because she's far from the only example of this. I especially find it neat when non-scientists are able to help root out scientific fraud specifically through non-scientist expertise. As a scientist who often finds herself propelled by sheer enthusiasm, sometimes feels overwhelmed by the "Publish or Perish" atmosphere in research, and who worries about the integrity of science when there's so much trash being published, it's heartening to see that enthusiasm and commitment to Truth still matters.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Research is based on the so-called scientific method (therefore science) and that is something you can't proof, just belief in. But it's the best we have with extraordinary amount of evidence to back it up.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was this guy who spent his whole life in rural Arizona. All evidence indicated that the world is made of sand.

Never discount errors of perspective.

If you consider something that all scientists do then you might see a vast shared error.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It was evident that the world was bigger than what the guy saw, he was just not checking (lazy or insatiable or whatever) what's further. There is the difference.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is why we put walls around our laboratories.

[–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

To form a solid base for the giant telescopes we put on them so we don't just see our small horizon.

using the scientific method to demonstrate that the scientific method is the most effective method of science is definitely one of the moments of all time, for science.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which, ironically, defeats the entire purpose of science.

thankfully i'm not a scientist, but if the people much smarter than me, and collective consensus say one thing, i'm likely to agree broadly with that sentiment. If not, same goes but in reverse.

Now if i were doing science on the other hand...