this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
150 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2168 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia has introduced a bill to ban social media access for children under 16, enforcing strict penalties of up to AU$50 million for non-compliance.

The law would require biometric or government ID for age verification and prohibits parental consent as an exemption.

While aiming to protect children from harmful content, critics argue it may drive teens to unregulated platforms.

Some services, like YouTube and WhatsApp, will be exempt for educational or messaging purposes.

The bill has bipartisan support but faces scrutiny from independents and child welfare advocates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[insert every shitty law that has ever been passed]. It’s a proposal…

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

kautau: every proposal passes!

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you know what's nice about logic? It's that claims can be tested. For example the claim "every proposal passes" one needs to find a single proposal that didn't pass.

Here you go 'No pathway,' Australian government abandons proposed social media misinformation laws.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lol first, I never claimed all proposals become law. I claimed all shitty laws were first proposals, you just added my username to your comment.

Second, your article is from 6 days ago, including the article they are sourcing, which appears to certainly be incorrect: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/labor-drops-controversial-misinformation-bill-amid-senate-opposition/edyo8iqh9

I can find no other evidence it was scrapped, all my information is from hours ago saying it’s been approved.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-passes-social-media-ban-children-under-16-2024-11-28/

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c89vjj0lxx9o

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/nov/29/how-australias-tough-social-media-ban-compares-to-laws-in-other-countries

You’re totally correct that logic is fun.

All bad laws were once proposals is true.

I said “all proposals become law” is false.

This bad proposal is now law is true.