this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
399 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
5725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
399
Top French newspapers sue X for unpaid use of their content (www.rfi.fr)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

on one hand fuck Twitter, but on the other... Link previews never should be considered copyright infringement.

[–] horse_tranquilizers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Make a paywall and see your support drop. Their fuck up for fucking up their html tags

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How do you know it's about link previews?

The arcticle mentions that it's about redistributing the content without payment.

Microsoft, Google and Meta got in trouble as well in the past and got a fine or agreed to paid up.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because that's one key feature in the "2019 European directive adopted into French law". It's also what the Google fine was about.

Also, X isn't really suitable for copy/pasting entire articles, like is done on lemmy. So that's probably not it.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that?

At the same time, the use of individual words or very short extracts of press publications by information society service providers may not undermine the investments made by publishers of press publications in the production of content. Therefore, it is appropriate to provide that the use of individual words or very short extracts of press publications should not fall within the scope of the rights provided for in this Directive. Taking into account the massive aggregation and use of press publications by information society service providers, it is important that the exclusion of very short extracts be interpreted in such a way as not to affect the effectiveness of the rights provided for in this Directive.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Hmm. It was a big issue at the time. In truth, I'm really not sure how it works in France. Anyway, the big fight going on is really about minimal previews. Unfortunately, there is no disinterested reporting on the issue. The media is very much profit-maximizing.

The recitals aren't part of the law, but should only guide the interpretation. Also, this is a directive. That means it directs the member states to make law, but has no direct effect, as such.

[–] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The bigger evil