this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2074 points (98.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17442 readers
557 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume "Other purposes" is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pasketti@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think something like this would make U.S. citizens feel better about taxes in general, since it can sometimes feel like you're throwing a large portion of your hard-earned money away.

[โ€“] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The data to create this is essentially public with budget bills right? It would just take building a percentage tree and categorizing them appropriately. I might look into how complex this would be to build.

[โ€“] jcit878@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

its basically just proportioning out the nations budget against the amount of tax paid,assuming you had access to how much was spent where by category, it would be a peice of piss to make

[โ€“] cubicle0924@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Luckily they even do the categorization and calculate percentages for you!

https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/budget_function

[โ€“] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I had no idea this existed; thanks for the share!

[โ€“] a9249@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

true but seeing how much goes to welfare might make republicans hit the roof. Everyones got that uncle that hates the poors.

[โ€“] Gerbler@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Mind you the largest chunk of that is the elderly with the unemployed being one of the smallest ones. I'm very much in favour of both by the way.

If you think your taxes are too high then it's not because too much is going to welfare; it's because too much is going to tax breaks (which won't show up on a chart like this) for fossil fuel companies and the wealthy.

[โ€“] Emu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Most in Australia don't read where the money goes. Taxes aren't too bad (IMO) and the system is so easy that once you submit you don't really go back to see where it went. Or maybe I live in a bubble.