Linux

48152 readers

774 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

527

Bitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linux (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://flathub.org/apps/com.bitwarden.desktop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But y tho?

[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

There's a big chunk of the Linux community that will always want to gatekeep it and push out anything that makes it easier for the layman to use

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wastes RAM and disk space (compared to package-manager installed applications) by storing more libraries on disk and loading them into RAM rather than just using the libraries already installed on the distro. It's probably better than Snap and Appimage though.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

That is definitely a sacrifice being made here I agree with you. It gives developers more control over exactly how their app runs, but it does mean less storage efficiency.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it even a problem for a desktop in 2024? Never had an issue with RAM or diskspace. And even for those that have, they can just not use flatpak until they upgrade, no reason to kill it.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume the "kill it" comment was a little tongue-in-cheek. On small SBCs, like a Pi, or old hardware, it could be a problem. I've seen people with flatpaks taking up 30GB of space, which is significant. I'm not sure how much RAM it wastes. I assume running 6 different applications that have loaded 6 different versions of Qt libraries would also use significantly more RAM than just loading the system's shared Qt libraries once.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see a problem with Flatpak in this. It does what it's supposed to do. You find not using it better? That's great, that option is the default in all of the distributives.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I agree. I do use Flatpaks, Snaps, and Appimages sometimes if I can't find a suitable deb repo/package. Flatpak is the best out of the three because they do try to avoid too much duplication through runtimes. I also use Docker quite a bit, which has similar issues (and benefits).