this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1056 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 322 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

He didn't expel all Russians, just the ones working for sanctioned Russian companies.

https://social.kernel.org/notice/AnIv3IogdUsebImO6i

[–] merari42@lemmy.world 112 points 2 weeks ago

Important context and a good decision

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That would've been great for them to clarify earlier XD

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 26 points 2 weeks ago

That would've generated fewer clicks. Sensationalism is always more profitable.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, this is The Register. Not exactly a paragon of stellar reporting here.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

No, this is on Linus and the Linux Foundation

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

RIGHT?? I was so disappointed until I learned that bit of context. Even the original article I read about it didn't mention it

[–] polar@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Good! So why the incendiary comments Linus made on Russians. It is so hard to say something like this: "I have to expel them from the project due to a US law forced us to do it. However, I had trust on them all these years and they contributed a lot to the project (that is why they were working here). Now, I am against the law because we should not discriminate people for the origin. Moreover, the claim that they can harm the software is unwarranted because it is OPEN and many eyes are on it. Finally, this harms the entire Linux project because now makes it an "American"project rather than an global one. Sad times."

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Have you noticed exactly how many Russians are bigots who support the mass murder of their neighbors?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I mean there's probably a lot who don't, but they're busy firing missiles at civilians in Ukraine to get around their 15y work camp sentence.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago

You are going to find bigots in every country. In US the biggest political figures right now are a fascist and a genocide supporter.

[–] jas0n@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

xz attack was an open source attack and it would be silly to assume that it was unique.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This has nothing to do with xz

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you understood their point.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jas0n@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In response to:

Moreover, the claim that they can harm the software is unwarranted because it is OPEN and many eyes are on it.

The xz attack was an intentional backdoor put into a project that was "OPEN and many eyes are on it." Also, it was discovered due to the way it was executing and not because someone found it in the source. The original assumption has been proven wrong.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, yep I didn't see that. Though definitely more eyes are on Linux than were on xz