this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
164 points (94.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43966 readers
1500 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Avoid subscription services. You may pay more short term, but you won't have to remember to cancel anything

[โ€“] 0_0j@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This, the only monthly subscription I have is internet plan from my cellular provider (15GB for $5 at 10mbps). Zero regrets

Any cheaper showoffs are welcomed :)

PS: I don't get why people subscribe to music services. I mean, you could just download your favorites and listen locally...

[โ€“] filcuk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, I could, and would like to own my copies. It's just that would be a lot of work and money with the experience ultimately being worse.

[โ€“] 0_0j@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They trick you to think it is (by screaming features at you that you soldemly need), but IMHO, it's not. I only have a couple of songs that I like, and shazam new songs that I will hear along the way.

I honestly think that shazam is the only proper feature that I just might pay subscription for. It's brilliant. It just works, every time!

[โ€“] filcuk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a service that extracts my playback data.
I'm fairly confident I would not just discover 6700 different artists by word of mouth, searching, or shazam combined. It would take a lifetime.
Shazam identifies music that's playing- where is it playing from in the first place?

We seem to have different use cases.

Exactly. I want to discover new artists, and sometimes I accidentally discover old artists that I should have known about but sheltered, raised-on-small-town-Midwestern-radio old me never could.

[โ€“] 0_0j@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay, let's say you're really into this feature.

With all the enshitifications global conglomerates are doing, how sure are you that the company will hold on to the promises they made?

I mean, this data is on their servers, right? (Even if it is stored locally, it's probably scrambled, like the local downloaded music, so that no one else can take advantage of it)

We all forget that these companies operate on a "for profit" basis and will always find ways to maximize it.

Why? Corporate overlords are greedy. Not that I'm against it. They just soldemly ignore the "imaginary line" to absurdity that should not be crossed.

After all, even google found a way to go around the "don't be evil" policy; right now, I get shoved a minimum of 6 ads, each video ๐Ÿ˜ก

Spotify users, get ready for ads right before the chorus of your fav songs.