this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
223 points (96.3% liked)

Movies

7460 readers
61 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Budget: $120 million [source]

Opening weekend gross: $4 million

Factoring in marketing costs and the theaters taking their cut of the profits, Megalopolis would need to make at least $300 million to break even. I think it's safe to say that's not happening.

It would have been THE worst opening for a $100 million movie ever, had it not been for Pluto Nash's horriffic opening 22 years ago.

Even The New York Times is reporting near-empty screenings of Megalopolis!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Pretty sad, this was apparently Coppola's drram movie he always wanted to make

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder if it's any good, all I hear is how little money it made like that means anything to anyone but the producers.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

its annoyingly complex with little payoff. i know watching it a few times will bring it into focus, but thats a weird requirement.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Not with Coppola, Apocalypse Now requires several watches, including the re-releases, directors cut, etc

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

The only people I have seen saying good things about it, are the same people who think hating what's popular is a personality trait.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's bad. If it was good, the story would have been pretty different.

Obviously some people will still like it. But even those will have to admit it's an incredible mess, and it shows why no company wanted to invest in it.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

https://wikiless.chaosmos.io/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films?lang=en

Clearly /s

My money is still on it being a masterpiece and people being morons.

Edit: updated wikiless instance

[–] Sylence@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

I saw it hoping this was the case, but sadly it's just not very good. I loved the visuals, the ambition, and his commitment to try and breakout of traditional storytelling methods, but the ham-fisted handling of the subject matter really ruined it for me. By all means see it for yourself and be your own judge but I wouldn't go in expecting an underrated masterpiece.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wikiless.org is using a TLS cert that expired in February.

I don't know the project very well but if they've been giving cert errors for half a year it might be time to link directly to Wikipedia.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm on LibRedirect so I didn't give it much of a thought.

Apparently ( https://github.com/Metastem/wikiless ) the domain is supposed to be https://wikiless.chaosmos.io

https://wikiless.chaosmos.io/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films?lang=en <- this seems good, I'll edit the previous link.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's wrong with just linking to Wikipedia?

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

Personally, a healthy habit not to rely on lazy patterns, and it possibly helps people that may be browsing from a place where wikipedia is censored.

But a much less stupid explanation can be found here: https://github.com/whereismybugfix/wikiless#why-i-should-use-wikiless-instead-of-wikipedia

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

He sexually harassed extras on set. I'm glad this pretentious asshole loses his money.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's bad. It's bad and we've been knowing this for months, as it premiered in some festival.

It's so bad no distributors wanted any piece of the cake (because the necessary costs are astronomical).

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Not really sad. Coppola is an artist, first and foremost, and he said that he doesn't care whether the film will be financially successful. It is a passion project financed at least partially from his own money, and to be his magnum opus.