379
Supportive dad (lemy.lol)
submitted 1 day ago by nzmaa@lemy.lol to c/greentext@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I see. I neglected an interpretation and it was important. So if someone says, for example and not necessarily making assertions about the OOP, that "I'm trans because I was born with a micropenis and that fuckin' sucks," your internal response would be "This person is trans, but doesn't understand why they are trans." [Or that it is likely that they don't understand, and see what I said before about this implying it is true of some hypothetical people]

Is that a more fair representation of your view?

(I put this under the wrong comment at first somehow, but also I was partly using information from that one)

[-] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, exactly.

The word "likely" is just me acknowledging the potential for this view of trans people as being born trans, which is based on research, could change as more research is done.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
379 points (93.0% liked)

> Greentext

7451 readers
277 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS