193
submitted 2 days ago by 101@feddit.org to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How did you get pics from inside Mozilla HQ? What a shitshow of a company at this point.

Im grateful to the people there keeping Firefox alive, but at this point they should consider splitting off from Mozilla and maintaining a fork or just joining the librewolf team.

[-] yozul@beehaw.org 17 points 1 day ago

It would be nice, but they gotta eat.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

The one Mozilla executive who agrees with you (that employees should be put ahead of profit) is currently embroiled in a lawsuit with Mozilla over that.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Im 100% certain there is enough funding going to mozilla that is specifically intended to help firefox. All those donors, private and commercial, could/would switch if the public stunt of declaring mozilla a sinking ship is aggressive enough. I dont believe for even a second that more than 5-10% of mozillas money is going towards actual core firefox/thunderbird dev work. Its not cheap to develop im sure, but nowhere near the amount of money that mozilla sucks up every year.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Their finance reports are public. You should look at those, if that's what you believe.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

I installed Palemoon because it's more independent from Firefox, having forked longer ago, but what I'm really looking forward to is for a usable browser to come from the Servo project.

[-] JaimeC@noc.social 3 points 1 day ago

@loaExMachina @unexposedhazard I have Pale Moon installed for testing purposes but as a general use browser it's pretty useless on the modern web since the developer REFUSES to allow it to support the Widevine plug-in making it useless for watching streaming video. It won't even load YouTube videos properly.

[-] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

Not supporting DRM on the web is a concious choice I support, you should have base Firefox for your proprietary tech consumptions

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

The lack of sandboxing is concerning though. Regardless of DRM needs. After all a web browser is basically a JavaScript runtime environment that runs code from all over the web. Having that not be sandboxed is a serious risk, even on operating systems like Linux where applications generally run with restricted privileges.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
193 points (87.0% liked)

Firefox

17296 readers
392 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS