this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1213 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

45653 readers
1369 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 121 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What the actual fuck⁈ “Batteries can catch on fire.” Sure, whatever could go wrong with a 1000l tank of FUCKING GASOLINE.

AAAaaaaHHhh I hate people!

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Going with the “batteries catch on fire argument” is stupid. “Batteries are heavy and expensive” is probably more compelling. But yeah, wires are better solution for things going in fixed routes.

[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The ammount of water required to put out a normal car is infinitely less than the amount required to put out a battery fire.

Not to mention the extra weight, nor the retention loss per recharge meaning we need to change batteries every 2-4 years polluting a lot more, we ain't even talking about the energy loss when doing the conversion to electric and then again to mechanical.

The electric transport is the way to go in the future, but firts it needs to have a solid foundation, and nuclear is the way to go at least in this moment. Otherwise we are only making things worse.

Edit for those wondering about the battery degradation: https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/

[–] riskable@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

we need to change batteries every 2-4 years

Wait, what‽ No. We don't need to change batteries every 2-4 years. That's what you do with TV remote controls and temperature sensors, not electric car batteries, LOL!

Electric car batteries are made to last at least 7 years (from a warranty standpoint) but in reality it's more like 10. Not only that but they're not single, gigantic objects. They're made of lots of "cells" so if one of them is going bad you can replace just that one bad cell.

Anecdote: The batteries in my Prius lasted 15 years before I had to replace one of the cells. Then a year later I had to replace another one. A year after that I sold it so I have no idea how the batteries are doing right now but I'm sure another cell would probably need to be replaced by now 19 years in service).

I'd also like to point out that the latest electric car batteries are vastly superior to the ones in my Prius.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, what I've heard is that water cooling the batteries (like almost every EV does now) massively extends the life. Early Prius batteries had no cooling and the heat degraded them faster. 15 years is a pretty good life still.

On the subject of battery warranty:

The federal government requires manufacturers to offer an eight-year/100,000-mile warranty on all EV batteries. California does one better, mandating a warranty of 10 years or 150,000 miles. Some companies will cover a battery only if it completely stops working, while others will replace the battery if it falls below a certain capacity, usually 70% of the original, while still under warranty.

It's important to note, a degraded battery, even with 50% of its original capacity is still useful. Someone who doesn't need the range could drive it, or the battery could be taken apart, and have the cells repurposed or recycled. Lithium and some of the other rare metals used in batteries are quite valuable for recycling, and our abilities to do so are getting better every year.

[–] MDKAOD@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Electric car batteries are made to last at least 7 years (from a warranty standpoint) but in reality it’s more like 10. Not only that but they’re not single, gigantic objects. They’re made of lots of “cells” so if one of them is going bad you can replace just that one bad cell.

Sincere question, what happens with the second hand electric vehicle market? New electrics make a ton of sense, but in my mind the 'used car' market becomes essentially unobtainable for poor folk. If a 12 year old electric vehicle hits the market, eventually the second or third owner is going to have to replace the batteries and poor people can't afford the 5000 plus labor to get new cells for it.

This isn't a situation that affects me, at the moment, but there are millions of people around the globe who buy the $1000 car and drive it until it just doesn't go anymore. I don't see that being an option for electrics.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sincere question, what happens with the second hand electric vehicle market?

Doesn't and won't exist. And it might be a "conspiracy theory" but I do think it is totally intentional.

[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't mean it literally, but easily it could be considering how u lose performance if u use a battery powered vehicle in somewhere to hot, or to cold.

Also, look how much degradation suffers the battery's https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to Geotab a Tesla will be at 90% of it's initial State of Health (SoH) after 5 years of use while a Leaf (which is well-known for shit thermal management and poor battery quality) will be at 80%. That's worse than their other charts which show averages of 85% SoH in an equivalent amount of time.

Regardless, even operating at 80% after five years is completely fine. The curve isn't really linear anyway so after about 10 years the batteries will likely be operating at about 70% of their original SoH in the worst case scenario.

Also consider that the price of lithium ion batteries has dropped consistently year over year for the past decade. There was a bit of a hiccup because of COVID but that's over now and the price is continuing to drop. That means the cost of a replacement battery pack in 10 years will likely be 60-90% cheaper (if the current trend continues) than it is today.

[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So? First of all, my platina already has more than 12-13 years and if I lose any performance if I lose any at all, is gonna be maybe, MAYBE %3. And the real matter is all the implications of making those batteries, contamination, and NO FUCKING IMPROVEMENT OVER A NORMAL CAR, in any case it would be worse. What's the point of making ur car battery dependent when the energy used to charge it comes from burning the same fossil fuel as before, but now losing energy in the conversions from one kind of energy to another.

That's without even talking about all the draconian software locks, how companies r starting to lock functions wich already come with the vehicle, how they r trying to kill the right to repair, etc, etc, etc. We don't even know if changing batteries is gonna be allowed or if its gonna be illegal in some way as apple shenanigans already did it in Mexico where its now illegal to even install linux in a computer u already buy it since it would be "alteration without agreement". Want a real change and really helping the planet? we need better public transport and changing how we produce electric energy as a whole, because right now just putting a battery in a car and calling it a day is just additional problems to the already present ones in traditional cars.

load more comments (5 replies)

Just remember that "good" solutions are still preferred over "bad" solutions, and there are never any "perfect" solutions. I see too many people think electric cars are terrible because of what they've been told, like the batteries. For me, it's like "Yeah, but they're still better than ICE vehicles". They'll get better, they're definitely not perfect, but they are just better

[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YOu can't really stop a lithium ion battery fire, all you can do is keep it from catching other things on fire around it, you pretty much just have to let it burn out.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which means you need to dunk it in a pool. How many of those does your local FD has? 1-5?

[–] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

and nuclear is the way to go at least in this moment.

Nuclear is about to go away, looking at the statitics.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Nuclear is about to go away FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK German government

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah.... not really something I want to see happening.

Ideally solar + nuclear could be the solution we need.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Batpool23@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup batteries are not the way. By the time the batteries need to be replaced you might have helped slightly but probably not. Batteries is a illusion to going green right now. Just another product that has a demand and an easy market for it.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I think we're all aware of the costs associated with recycling batteries.

Are you aware of the costs associated with high CO2 levels?

Have to choose the lesser of two evils.

[–] paddytokey@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would be a better alternative if you exclude the use of fossil fuels?

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

fixed overhead wires, as OP suggested?

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You’re aware that diesel is quite hard to catch on fire

[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why he said gasoline tho

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

But that’s not relevant for busses

[–] Platomus@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No it's not. It's harder to catch fire than gasoline.

It still catches fire easily.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can toss a lit match into a puddle of diesel and the match will go out. Diesel burns, but since it doesn't evaporate as fast as gasoline, you don't have those flammable gases hanging in the air. A trail of diesel that's being burned at one end will not spread, unlike gasoline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Gasoline doesn't burn that easily, either. Cars with gas tanks don't burst into flames while sitting powered off in a garage. Even when they get wrecked they don't usually burst into flames.

On the other hand, gasoline is slowly causing the world to burst into flames…

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gasoline and diesel can be extinguished relatively easily. Extinguishing an EV means throwing it into a tub of water for a day or two

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gasoline vehicles also don't tend to catch fire spontaneously while parked. That risk exists with every unattended lithium-ion battery undergoing recharging. People technically shouldn't be plugging their phones in at night and then going to sleep, but everyone does it anyway.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Doesn't matter much for phones, but when talking EV charging... Night electricity tends to be cheaper when it's not solar energy season.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait for miles of 240V extension cords when EU makes even used non EVs illegal. Yes, millions of city dwellers in apartments totally have a garage to charge in.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

There will be solutions by 2050 (the proposed timeframe for having a zero-emissions fleet). For an example, vehicles with combustion engines can still be newly registered after 2035 if they use only CO2-neutral fuels. I think EU would rather ban sale of fossil fuels than ban used cars that can technically burn fossil fuels. If only plant-based fuels are available, it doesn't matter what the cars can technically burn.

The German big 3 are already developing cars that would only run on non-fossil fuels I believe.

Secondly, chargers near apartment buildings and on sidewalks can be added. We have plenty of time.

And I'm sure Germany will water down the regulations even more so in the end, I'm fairly sure they'll consider new MHEVs fine after 2035.

And finally, those who can't charge at home will do so at the charging stations. It's not a huge issue if you have a battery with 500+ km of range. Might be an issue for i-miev and first gen Leaf owners though.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please don't put lithium in water; that will make it worse.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Tell that to firefighters.