this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
845 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3599 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
845
China is attempting to mirror the entire GitHub over to their own servers, users report (infosec.exchange)
submitted 4 months ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
283 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users' repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Does it though? You can still put up a fork somewhere else as long as you uphold the license right? Unless I guess in the case where the license explicitly disallows forks, but I don't think that's very common (can you even do that?).

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Forks are derivative works (quite obviously) so yes you can forbid them via license terms. Whether or not that's still open source, take it up with OSI. I vaguely recall that at least once upon a time there was some project that required modification to the code to be published as separate patches and it was generally accepted to be open source don't ask me which.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Most GitHub repos don't have a license, meaning you are not licensed to do anything with them. Rehosting them would be the same as rehosting an image you don't have a license for.