Yeah that looks worse

If either of you opened the article, you would know you are correct. There is a picture in the article, the ad is a static banner next to the paused video.

Google probably only spent months researching this and they only have all the tracking and user studies to know what you said. Please ignore the obvious fact that you are looking at the screen when you are pausing or resuming a video, KingJalopy knows better and Google is just dumb. Nobody will see any of these ads and they are adding them in vain.

May point is that it might be a mistake of the character, intended by the writers, not a mistake by the writers.

It's a common mistake, so isn't a character in a movie making it realistic? Wouldn't it be out of character for many characters to have perfect English?

Not vodka, but you get lots of ads for 0% beer. Which ends up advertising beer while going around the rules.

Presumably because letting the cops know you are defenseless is not what they want to message.

Thanks, that explains it. So there is a pop-up when you try to play a game from the common pool and you have to choose who you are borrowing from?

Nobody is giving anybody permission any more than anyone else though. Account 6 creates a family and 5 accounts with a game join the family. There are now 5 copies of the game in the family pool. Account 6 can play and get banned. In this situation nobody even invited account 6 to the family.

Being able to evade a ban once is already a problem. Now you need to ban every cheater twice to really ban them.

My question is, when there are 5 people with 5 copies of a multiplayer game in the pool, and the 6th member without a copy gets banned, which of the other 5 members gets banned?

No one said they are unpaid or have zero qualifications either.