266
submitted 3 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mapto@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

So much wrong about this chart. It is factually correct, but it answers the wrong question.

This chart makes it way too easy to optimise for cheap protein, which is misleading. It is not this what it takes to have a healthy organism. It takes a varied diet, with balanced quantities of liquids (see milk), vitamins (see sprouts), fatty acids (see salmon), minerals (see shrimps, eggs, walnuts), actually carbs (potatoes, rice, spaghetti), and much more...

[-] NomenCumLitteris@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Most crucially, the graph is an oversimplification of protein content. Legumes do not contain the full amino acid chain unlike meat. Non-meats need to be evaluated with the nuance of its nutrients not necessarily being as bio-available for human digestion. Carrots and Vitamin A, for example.

[-] ElmarsonTheThird@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Thank you for saying this. The PDCAAS shows the digestible properties of different protein sources. It would be a good multiplicative factor for the X-Axis to make the sources comparable, since Cow's Milk, Chicken, Egg, Whey, Casein, Tuna and Soy Protein (Isolate) have a score of 1 while Lentils, Tofu, Rice and Wheat have roughly 0,5.

That means you need to eat (and buy and cook) twice the amount of the latter to gain roughly the amount of actionable protein of the former.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
266 points (92.9% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

0 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS