this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
1155 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59243 readers
3375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I have a feeling Foo Fighters/Dave Grohl must mean a lot to you and this must be a very difficult discussion for you to have. I’m not really sure I deserve the snipes you are taking at me so I’ll just leave it there. Hopefully you’ll understand the response to it isn’t as binary as your making it out to be, and that you don’t need to be so angry/hostile for people questioning the decision of a successful musician. It’s just a discussion about what we perceive as social responsibility.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not a fan of the Foo Fighters I think they’ve already sold out & while I don’t dislike them, I’m not a fan.

What’s difficult about this conversation is that everyone else has made it black & white, over whether Amazon’s money is tainted.

That’s everyone’s only argument, Amazon money is bad & the Foo Fighters shouldn’t have taken it.

But… that argument ignores the nuance I’m trying to point out.

That money was going to be given to a band or musician for concert full of gross Amazon execs. Full stop. That is all it was ever going to be used for by Amazon & neither you or I can stop it.

So if the Foo Fighters shouldn’t have taken that money, than who should have received it? What band would you prefer to have played for Amazon?

That concert was going down with it without the Foo Fighters. So if not them, then who?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You’re saying everybody else has made a black-and-white, but I am here trying to talk to you about it in a nuanced way, which you responded to by attacking me personally and pushing it back into a more black-and-white discussion. I’m not really sure what you want out of this so I think it’s best we just let it go. You seem quite heightened for somebody who is not emotionally invested in it.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m emotionally invested in it because I’m sick of letting corporations take things I love away from me.

I have been to hundreds of concerts, followed bands across the country, and spent hours upon hours waiting in line for tickets. I used to go stand in line at a damn Kroger to get tickets so I could avoid paying Ticket Master more money.

I live music & I hate corporations trying to put their names on it.

I have not made of this black & white. I am not the one drawing a line in the sand with the Foo Fighters. I’m here trying to convince you all from walking away from something that makes you happy because of some self righteous sense of morality.

The Foo Fighters simply did what the do, perform music for money. Everyone else is black & white over where that money came from. Not even what the band did with the money, just where the money came from.

Bad news friend, you aren’t going to find clean money in the music industry. It’s all foul.

You want to abandon something that makes you happy or think less of it because dirty money touched it? Your fuckin loss.

But don’t call yourself a fan. If you were, you’d at least have the patience to hear the band’s side of it before coming in a thread like this joining in on all rage bait in here.

That music is yours to love, don’t give it to Jeff. That is my only investment in this conversation.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nobody is taking anything away from you and you don’t love foo fighters. You’re mad because people are upset at an artist’s decision. You’re projecting a lot on to this man.

You’re saying it’s our loss and it doesn’t matter but you’re also mad that people are saying “I don’t personally support this” as if my feelings on the matter impact you in the slightest. No one is forcing you to do anything.

Go see Dave Grohl perform. Don’t go see Dave grohl perform. Nothing here changes that. That ball is still squarely in your court.