this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
162 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9622 readers
661 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Can we add The Guardian to a tabloid ban? These articles are shit. They can't even cherry pick their own data consistently.

  1. the graph in the article shows SUV sales are still less then cars. Fine print: only in rich countries

  2. to even come close, they have to lump in EV SUV's, which doesn't add to the CO2 they are complaining about.

  3. ahhhh it takes more effort to counter bad journalism which is why it's so prevalent but here a rundown:

• 20% CO2 production is for conventional SUV's. This doesn't include electric which has the highest adoption rates.

• More EV vehicles are classified and built as SUV's due to weight, limiting adoption of electric cars, but is still increasing at 55%

• Carmakers don't necessarily want bigger and heavier cars; that is more material to buy. They want to make what sells and bigger, heavier cars have better crash test ratings.

Just more churn from the incite and radicalize machine: The Guardian.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Carmakers don't necessarily want bigger and heavier cars; that is more material to buy.

But it's higher margins, and they can phase out lower margin vehicles by marketing them less and producing fewer of them.