this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
125 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

34838 readers
15 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThermoToaster@exng.meme 9 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Who needs 4K when 1080 already looks sharp to the human eye.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Humans can't see more than 24 fps anyways

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the perceptual limit is around 60 or 80fps, but don't quote me on that

[–] chayleaf@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

as a rhythm gamer, I can say you're full of shit lol

I have 240hz and the difference between 120hz and 240hz is somewhat noticeable, don't see why I'd need any more than this though

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Depends on the size of screen, surely.

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Dumb comparison

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Angular definition. You have to factor in screen size and distance to observer, otherwise it's meaningless

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Who needs 1000hz 4k when 120hz 2k is already stupidly expensive to achieve with most AAA games