this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
493 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9789 readers
6 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the alternatives should be good enough that raising gas prices isn't a problem.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Please tell me your plan to collect all of the people spread across half of a state who commute to a central location.

Mobility enables poor people. Not all poor people live in an idealistic 15-minute city.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think rural living makes sense if you're also commuting. Small towns can have good transport links to other nearby towns but I don't think it makes sense to support those who decide they want to live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I understand that you're doing a thought experiment about futuristic utopias but I am talking about the current situation right now and a comment that started this chain.

People live in rural areas whether you think they should or not and raising gas prices to reduce car travel disproportionately affects those people.

Now, if there was some way for poor people to get fuel credits or something so that they're empowered with mobility maybe that would work.

We also should probably not make farming any harder than it already is.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

It's not a utopia, it's perfectly possible if we work towards it.

And I said

live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

Specifically to exclude farmers

[–] ComplexLotus@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In 2020 according to statistics 82.66% of all americans lived in cities, not spread across half the state. Urban areas and country side should be developed differently of course.

[–] iHop_Femboy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And as everyone knows, all those 82% are commuting to the same place

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

TIL cities cant have central mass transport

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

We're talking about rural areas.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There are other places in the world who do this much better than the US. How about instead of assuming it's impossible because you haven't seen it you consider that it is, in fact, possible but the image has been designed to make it appear impossible by those benefiting from it not being done.

Also, choosing to live away from work is a choice. Suburbia is a choice, and actually one that costs more money in taxes than it makes over time, requiring it to continue to expand or admit it doesn't work. You can choose to live closer, or even choose to bike to a bus stop/train station/whatever that is positioned reasonably if things weren't designed around making car and gas company executives rich.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Also, choosing to live away from work is a choice.

Uh no in fact it's absolutely not a fucking choice for most people.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yes it is. It always is. There may be a premium, but there's a cost to car ownership and usage as well, but also more importantly there's taxes we all pay to keep rural or suburban life possible. Suburbs actually take more on taxes than they produce. The problem is that cost is socialized, which is fine if more costs were socialized.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes it is. It always is.

No it just fucking isn't. You really think every place of work magically has dozens of free apartments close to it and you can just hop to a different one every time you change jobs? What fucking fantasy land do you live in?

[–] LovesTha@floss.social 1 points 8 months ago

@Cethin @space_comrade More aptly: "designing society so that the only affordable housing is far from jobs that we require people to have to deem them worthy of existing" is a choice.

There are many things we can change to fix this.

Further, there are many things that should be changed to fix this.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Suburbia? Thanks for showing you have no idea what I'm talking about.

[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Mobility enables poor people

True

Not all poor people live in an idealistic 15-minute city

Dude, i live in the fucking state of mexico, we don't even have rail. And even when we touch the city it's at least half an hour to get to the city center of Mexico city.

And yet, u know what makes it possible for me to come work every day to the city? Public transport.

So yeah, fuck that idea about how it wouldn't work, put some buses to work out there and even the traffic problem will be lessened since there will be less cars on the road, not to mention how it should be even cheaper since the cost of transportation its gonna be equally split in a bigger ammount of passengers.