1714
submitted 10 months ago by sag@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml

by fedidb.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

I comment on stuff to try to make discussions active, it rarely works.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

It has to be authentic, you can't just comment to comment.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago

That's just not true. I've made comments that I thought desirve no reply but humans find a way. If there's no comments to read the shared content just isn't that interesting. If I see comments then the shared content must be interesting enough to justify a discussion.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I can agree with that, but being authentic definitely helps the conversations take off.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

Of course it helps. But some of my shitty comments are scaping the bottom of the barrel of my knowledge or patience with the replier...

[-] harry_balzac@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I comment because I crave validation from Internet strangers.

[-] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago
[-] Selkie@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

That's a very good comment

[-] alp@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

You know what? i just did!

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

This is something I've learned from online game forums. You actually have to be divisive to get a high amount of concurrent users.

It only seems to be the shit-shows that anyone feels obligated to post in.

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 13 points 10 months ago

Well I think you're wrong, fuck you and your opinion /s

I actually don't know to what extent I agree with you, but your theory certainly feels plausible to me. It reminds me of the internet adage about how the best way to get a right answer to your question is to be wrong. I can't remember what it's called.

[-] randy@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Cunningham's law. And just to buck the trend, you didn't have to get it wrong to get the right answer ;).

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 1 points 10 months ago

Aye, cunningham seemingly meant it as the fastest answer though, which was the sentence right afterwards in that wiki entry. So maybe mr. anarchist-with-a-machine-fetish would have gotten an answer earlier if he had said it was the anti-murphy's law.

[-] AeroLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Division gives people something to talk about. Not everyone can think of something constructive and interesting to say at a given time, but when presented with an opinion, it is trivial for most people to formulate a comment either agreeing or disagreeing with it.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well i think it’s stupid that we need that divisiveness

[-] AeroLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I never said it was a good thing.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And I never said you said it was a good thing.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

I’ve been pretty successful and keeping conversations going! I DO comment quite a bit, though.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1714 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45196 readers
2629 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS