this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
881 points (100.0% liked)

196

16461 readers
1728 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes we do

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Well, some people prefer dogs, some prefer cats and some prefer sheeps... ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Yeah but can sheep really consent, without a massive power dynamic

[โ€“] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Consent requires sentience so no animal can consent regardless of power dynamic.

[โ€“] Grapetruth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hence why veganism is a moral obligation to animals. It's indefensible to kill or exploit/harm an animal without their consent (which they can't give), and which clearly isn't in their best interests

[โ€“] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

it makes no sense to discuss consent from non-human animals. do you ask plans for consent before cutting them? or doors for consent before opening them and putting your whole body through them?

[โ€“] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

That's a stupid argument, just by having sentience doesn't mean we have any moral obligations to our food sources. There are plenty of incentives to human being's health and society by reducing meat consumption, why would you choose such a weak reason instead?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)