this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
401 points (73.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9662 readers
129 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Such a bike-only city just have to build heated underground tunnels for biking. If a New York subway style bike highway isn't good enough., since wind chill and all that, instead build a city-wide roof over the first floor of all the buildings in the city to basically make that first floor a basement.

This is obviously an extreme answer, but if a city wanted to be bike-only, the only barrier is cost.

no city wants to do that, but they could. Stick Solar panels on the first floor roof and do the solar freaking roadways idea to heat up the tiles and avoid plowing (without needing to make them car-proof.)

I got myself all excited, I wish this was more than a modern fantasy.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

do the solar freaking roadways idea to heat up the tiles and avoid plowing (without needing to make them car-proof.)

The problem with this idea is that melting snow takes a ridiculous amount of energy. (and also no one wants to feel banished underground)

Again, these problems have already been solved. Compress the snow on bike paths, and make a reliable public transport system for when its really too cold.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cost is a pretty huge barrier. Money doesn't grow on trees.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bike lanes cost less than car lanes. Bike-path-sized snowplows probably cost less than car-lane-sized ones, too.

Bike infrastructure only seems unaffordable for those who dishonestly see it as an add-on on top of car infrastructure, rather than correctly as a replacement for (some of) it.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Bike infrastructure only seems unaffordable for those who dishonestly see it as an add-on on top of car infrastructure, rather than correctly as a replacement for (some of) it.

Well sure, bike infrastructure is cheap if you take a road for cars, ban all cars, and declare it bike only.

But that's so ridiculous it's not worth mentioning.