this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
748 points (90.3% liked)

Games

16828 readers
971 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
748
Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly (twitter.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
507 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't that just saying you can't sell access to a game on steam (through a steam key) for a lower price than what's on Steam? It's not like they can't just offer a lower price... just that they can't offer it for a lower price bundled with Steam access.

So they can offer a lower price, just not as a third party through Steam itself.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I think you are right, the first article I linked was a bit ambiguous about it, but rereading the second one it seems that I misunderstood it and you are right.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

If it was only about Steam Keys, there wouldn't have been a lawsuit.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If that's the case, why do people use sites like humble bundle when they could individually buy the games from steam?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humble Bundle has a special relationship with Valve iirc, because of the charity work they do.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't explain all the other games sold for cheaper than steam when you take a look at isthereanydeals. Or the bundles fanatical offers with no charity involved.

[–] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I believe it means base price and not sale prices

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Could be secondhand key resellers who have no deals with Steam regarding sales.

[–] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it means base price and not sale prices. It's fine for a game to go on sale for lower than Steam, but the base price can't be $60 Steam $50 Epic as an example.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

That is also allowed, but not if Epic purchase allows you to play the game on steam too