this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
2581 points (96.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
779 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That might be acceptable if they didn't turn at least half of the bullshit back on with every bigger update. And some things just can't be turned off. E.g last time I checked it was impossible to tell Windows not to “recommend” setting edge as default browser in the fucking start menu.

    [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Who told you it was impossible? Let me be clear, the things Windows support people say are "impossible" certainly are possible, they just aren't recommended or authorized by Microsoft i.e. Breaking License Validator for endless Valid activation.

    The really "impossible" ones often require a lot of work, such as patching dlls or exe files, they're still possible though. Microsoft and their stans can argue "but security" but the fact of the matter is that windows is already insecure garbage, it's not going to get any better and arguments that it will are almost 100% cope. If security was a real concern they would've jumped ship long ago to a Unix system like Linux.

    [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yeah, and if you patch things like this you break updates completely. Luckily I switched to Linux before thinking of doing bullshit like that.

    [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I've already tried it before, can confirm it breaks updates completely, also breaks the UWP apps since they depend on update functionality to keep working.

    Should note that even though I still have the computer it was installed on I don't use it anymore, I've moved on to better Hardware and Linux.

    [–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Its time to start replacing dll files

    [–] uint8_t@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    pro tip: replace all the dll files at once using mkfs.ext4

    [–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I got an error when trying to do so

    ' mkfs.ext4' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.

    You can download it here

    Just get brave browser and set that as the default. No issue.