this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
840 points (99.2% liked)

Games

32695 readers
1127 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just because it looks better to shareholders now doesn't make it a good business decision. I swear the majority of CEO types don't give a damn if the company goes under in a few years because they either:

  1. Have a golden parachute in place by sucking up to the Board.

  2. Will move on to another CEO position at another company before it folds. Bonus points if they golden parachute on the way out.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

It's a good decision for the CEO though. That's part of the problem, they're not beholden to the business. They'll just bugger off and go elsewhere.

[–] Jajcus@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Modern corporate management model is just broken.

[–] HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

That's what the golden parachute is supposed to be for: a payout long term so the CEO doesn't make a short term decision that fucks the company up but pays out big. Ex: offering a stock package that you can't sell for 5-10years.

A decision like this will pay out HUGE in the short term, but if they don't change it I doubt many will be using unity in a few years.