Gaming

19967 readers

82 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

peternile@lemmy.ml

FTC: Xbox-exclusive Starfield is “powerful evidence” against Activision deal (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Federal Trade Commission's request for an injunction stopping that acquisition heads toward opening arguments this week, the federal regulator cites one piece of what it calls "powerful evidence" that it can't trust Microsoft's assurances. In short, as the FTC puts it, "Microsoft's actions following its 2021 acquisition of ZeniMax speak louder than Defendants' words."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not American so not following it that closely, by everythin I've seen online in the last few days have indicated that the FTC are faltering and showing a massive lack of knowledge about the gaming industry at present.

[–] coderade@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like most regulatory bodies in the US have a massive lack of knowledge of modern industry practices. Or are willing complicit in the anti-consumer practices