this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
2078 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45643 readers
1261 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
2078
This community lately (feddit.nl)
submitted 1 year ago by eldain@feddit.nl to c/memes@lemmy.ml
252 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right what platinum coated bookmarks are they using? Firefox syncs bookmarks, has them organized by folders, has a bookmarks bar, can pin them to the start page, idk what else they need

[โ€“] Izaro@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As I've stated in the other comment, I mainly ment the UI. But there is another feature I like to use, which is the window-specific bookmark manager. I usually keep my browser activities separated with different windows(e.g. one for youtube documentaries and one for learning). With the Chromium manager, I can have one manager-tab per window. That's not possible with the Firefox manager. It's a small thing, but hey, it's convenient.

Then again, the bookmark manager wasn't the only reason I chose Brave over Firefox. If I remember correctly, I had three reasons why I chose Brave in the end:

  1. The bookmark manager - Reasons are stated here and in the other comment.
  2. Brave Ads - The privacy respecting ads make my mind feel at ease when using an adblocker, as I'm still contributing something.
  3. This one is the weakest one: Firefox just felt slower for me, to be honest.

I would've just put up with point three, but in order to leave the first two, Firefox would have to have other features I really want tu use. And that's the problem - it doesn't have those.