It seems like the story updated over time. Originally the bbc said making and then the article content updated to say received. Maybe they jumped the gun, I don't know.
If it was received, doesn't excuse the fact a person in his station should have reported it to the highest level. Who the fuck uses WhatsApp to view porn? Definitely sounds dodgy.
Unless you're renewing your copywrite every year, changing the date every year is wrong. You list the date it was copywrited, not the current year.
You don't. It's the year it was copywrited, not the current year.
Exactly this. People are so deluded that NATO aren't a world police force and isn't just a pact to protect its members is unreal
Yeah i often wonder.... Would they have changed the name of the game, paid me off, or done something like hellbladegame.com.
Also.... I once created hellblade.com. We sold gaming computers with cases that changed colour with heat in the UK. Was a total disaster. Now it's some big game franchise. Wish I'd kept the domain.
Footage I've seen so far has had Ukrainian pows returned on busses. Are we supposed to believe that this time they decided to launch an expensive to fly plane to transport just 65 pows. Every pow so far has been returned completely abused and malnourished. Suddenly this time they pulled out all the stops? It may have been shot down but there weren't pows onboard.
You only have to read the PR comments with people asking how you know if something is optional when there is absolutely zero jsdoc to know it was idiotic.
Webpack..... Aren't you on the vite train?
His blog to me sounds like he did it because it was too difficult for him to understand a few errors. Says it all.
When the country is putins cum sponge