usernamefactory

joined 1 year ago
[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed, well placed and executed action or sex scenes can be used to great effect. They are also equally capable of adding nothing but wasted time. My point is that bad action scenes have been wasting plenty of time in movies lately, so a desire for tight films with no fat is definitely not the cause for the comparative dearth of sex scenes.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is at least as true of action scenes, and it doesn't stop them from bloating the run time of 90% of the movies coming out today.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I grew up with this variation on my C64. Good times. https://gaming.trekcore.com/startrekc64-1/

I've also come across this mashup with 25th Anniversary, which looks like great fun: https://emabolo.itch.io/super-star-trek-25th

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Theory of relativity. Which one is in the mirror is entirely dependent on your frame of reference.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Now see, if they’d had Jokester Data drop that pun right before the credits rolled, I’d have forgiven the whole thing.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I thought the crossover element of Generations really brought it down. The original cast had a far better farewell in Star Trek VI, and I don’t think the writers of Generations had enough to say about Kirk’s character to justify the tortured story logic that brought him in.

Give me a Kirkless cut and I’ll be so much happier. All the pure TNG elements work fine for me, McDowell is great, and the D looks beautiful with cinematic lighting.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I was raised a Trekkie, can’t rightly say what my first contact was. My earliest memory of it was me expressing a preference for “the one with Spock” over TNG, the only other option at the time.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Canon is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Canon is a pretty flower… which smells bad.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

The distinction is lost on me, but cheers.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like to think that, whatever it is that earns O’Brien that distinction, it had already happened by the end of DS9. Probably some technical wizardry he came up with while hacking together Cardassian and Federation technology. Just something he did to get the job done, but that would be fully appreciated as a genius piece of work with huge applicability sometime well after his death.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Picard is super relevant, though. If we're talking about an alternate reality where Picard S3 never happened, then yeah, I'd agree that complaints about nostalgia are a little over blown. I don't see why that would be a discussion worth having, though. Picard did happen, and so did a whole lot of discussion about a possible Legacy show, and if you're wondering why you hear complaints about nostalgia, that's a big part of why.

That's not the entirety of it, though. Outside of Picard, I'll say that Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks absolutely trade heavily in nostalgia. I can't agree with your view that either don't count. Having a fresh style doesn't change the fact that SNW is set on the classic Enterprise and is continuing to introduce more and more classic Trek characters. And Lower Decks built a whole episode around the reuse of a specific cave set from TNG, of all things. A huge amount of its humour and appeal is definitely based in nostalgia.

I will say that it looks like Starfleet Academy on a good course to do it's own thing, Picardo notwithstanding, so I'm not saying the franchise has gone completely bankrupt or anything. I just think there's enough nostalgia going around that it's pretty valid to feel a little put off by it if one is so inclined.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's more about the trajectory of nuTrek than the whole of it. Discovery and the first two seasons of Picard did try to do new things and move the franchise in new directions, but now Discovery is cancelled in favour of SNW and Picard season 3 discarded so much the first two seasons had done in order to dive into nostalgia hard - and its success led to a lot of speculation about a "Star Trek Legacy" series that would double down on the fanservice approach even further. So it does feel like there's a trend towards "safer" nostalgic content.

And sometimes even fairly minor things just rub me the wrong way, like the Daniels reveal in Discovery. They just feel so arbitrary, and make the universe feel so mush smaller for no purpose.

view more: next ›