As long as you use an email that's not tied to you and provide fake info, there's no/minimal risk. Stupid as shit that we have to go to these lengths, but here wa are...
spooky2092
If they're acting in a capacity for the government, they're public servants with no expectations of privacy. Also, if you're in public, there's no expectations of privacy as is.
Take their photos and film them. Let them know they're being watched and their actions will be scrutinized. Authoritarians are less likely to escalate if there's evidence and they think there will be some kind of consequences. And they just have to wonder if some Mario will go green some day.
Again, we can't make you see the point if you don't want to.
You appear to be looking to not tell the two apart, and I don't particularly care to go into all the reasons why this mentality is stupid and reductive as hell to the point of being actively poisonous to the ends you're working to achieve. Because I've had this conversation before, and I literally can't make you see the point in looking into the differences when you don't want to. And, imo, that's the exact mentality that got us here, because why bother voting less bad when ThErE's No DiFfErEnCe BeTwEeN tHeM.
Perfect is the enemy of better, and chasing perfection instead of improving things is only going to burn it down. Which is also what a number of people who share your point of view want. And unfortunately, now is the time of monsters.....
Oh wow, so it really is just a speedrun 1920s/30s Germany.
Well, we can't make you see the difference if you don't want to.
I'll take the low energy and working brain over high energy dementia
I don't know if it's my phone or my fingers, but I constantly have issues with hitting the *3dot menu when I try to hit the vote buttons.
Oh, and inconsistent back behavior. When opening images, sometimes swiping for back closes the image and returns me to the post list, and sometimes it backs me out of the post list and I can't get back to the listing I had been looking through without reloading.
Idk, Christianity seems like much stronger brain rot.
It's not a template, they're going through lines in The Room.
Why would the year, the least important, need to be first?
For proper ordering for one. ISO8601 is objectively the best way to label anything that might need to be ordered based on time. This forces data points to line up properly in chronological order, and makes it easy to time slice as needed.
And why are the pieces of the pyramid made so the ISO standard is the only one that looks right?
Because it's the only one that goes from largest value to smallest. It's first because you start from the largest as the base (year) and work down through size to seconds.
ss:mm:hh:DD:MM:YYYY would also order the numbers based on length, but would look terrible if represented like that
Agreed. And any sort of data analysis would be so much harder
Oh don't get me wrong, I understand the point you're trying to make just fine. It's just a bad argument that falls apart if you aren't entirely privileged and give it more than a cursory, surface level look.