[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Wasn't an attempt at that btw but I don't think you care. It was meant to be more of a "oh boy let me tell ya" but I guess it didn't convey too well. They said they don't know anything about marketing costs. I was talking about business costs in general which is not the same thing and are unbelievably expensive just because they are enterprise level and not consumer. That's why it shouldn't be surprising if any service, like advertising, for a business is more expensive than you thought.

But please explain to me what grammar or punctuation has to do with any of this, or were you just trying to be offensive for the sake of it? Super relevant, super productive. This is the kind of thing people are happy to be leaving reddit isn't it?

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

super relevant, not everyone speaks english as a first language.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think the theory is that the power cable creates a magnetic field around it that could interfere with the ultra precise electronics and what we are looking at is shielding for it. It could be complete bullsh but there is scientific reasoning behind it. It's for people who pay premium to reach that final 5% and I have some weird kind of respect for such passion. When you are paying north of tens of thousands of dollars for a system, the expensive cable is the least of your problems.

That can't be said for people who pay several thousand dollars for a premium hdmi cable that is supposed to 4k-ify a full hd signal. That what constitutes as snake oil in my mind.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I dream of a world with a nsfw community on lemm.ee/c/smash

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Complete freedom is called anarchy.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

to be clear you mean more so the worth of a quest 2 rather than an index, right?

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

as an Estonian, about damn time. Such a silly topic to keep arguing over.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

So that's why I thought "local multiplayer" implies LAN, while what OP really meant is splitscreen multiplayer.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

lan, local area network. I guess people see it differently.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I was a bit confused when you said local co-op. It implies 2 computers on the same local network(connected to the same router, no internet connection required). I think the term you're looking for is split screen gaming.

When I looked at pictures of Spelunky games like Clonk and Liero popped into mind, I think there are options for split screen multiplayer in those games, they're old school PvP games.

[-] sombrero@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

the problem with shareholders is that they always and forever need to see a chart that's in a growing trend. That line is getting kind of stagnant there mate how you gonna please us? What makes this problematic is that there will be a finite number of users for this infinitely growing service, sooner or later growth will have to slow and this does NOT please the shareholder. Where are the gains bro? I was promised gains.

9
submitted 1 year ago by sombrero@lemm.ee to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
3
submitted 1 year ago by sombrero@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

sombrero

joined 1 year ago