[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 13 points 4 months ago

I believe it was you, and the Irish.

Oh shit, I just realized why they're mentioned. Yield, for they have the high ground, and cannot be sieged.

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 40 points 4 months ago

Strike, and strike again, deep into the heart of Mordor. Ignore the cries of those who only wish to keep their coffers full.

Slava Ukraini

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago

They only killed a small percentage of the people who purchased them. Please, think of the innocent shareholders.

ETA: Look at the downvotes on this new post. The one on my comment arrived instantly. Not normal on this site.

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 4 points 6 months ago

Thank you, democracy fans in the Netherlands!

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That was my first question as well, along with counting the many ways this could have turned out horribly. The article calls it a prank, but this had disastrous potential. Not just for the company; anything that goes wrong in that sector, in the way of IP theft and the like, will be blamed on the prankster first, until proven otherwise.

The casual way it's discussed, and calling it a prank, gets under my skin a little. Am I alone in that?

Think of how much policy will need to be typed up because of this, and again, the potential for disaster, on both sides. I'd be floored if a former employee did this to my team, and I wouldn't care if it was a joke, at all. At the very least, the dude would be trespassed, if for no other reason than to show he's been warned.

I'm just going to imagine that this guy wanted more funding allocated for his buddies in the IT department, and did this as a parting gift.

It's Just a Prank, Bro: Office Edition

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

Apologies for the confusion, and the late reply. I see what you mean; my comment could have been worded far better.

Exactly because of stuff like the above, I'm just returning from a long break from social media. I'll do better. Thanks for highlighting the issue, take care.

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, I am not sure, and I should have been clearer about my information being quite dated. Apologies for that, and for taking 3 months to reply (voluntary internet vacation).

In 2005, when I worked in purchasing, we needed a business license to order their business machines, and they were serious about it. But, e-commerce has changed drastically since then, when the only way to order was through the Dell website. Not surprised they're on Amazon.

Hopefully, the computers are still better on that side of things. What did you end up getting, and how do you like it?

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think it would be fun to be a serf, and I haven't idealized it. I made a dumb joke, based on a trope, and a couple of you guys just can't accept that, and have to leave a smug reply.

I worked in manual labor for decades, in worse conditions than any serf ever experienced, right up until my body fell apart. 20 years ago, I would have traded my life with nearly any serf, in a heartbeat, and I'd be far better off now.

But, I'm sure you could show little old me what hard living really is. If only I knew!

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Also, what bugs me about this is that your text editor is not "fedora/gnome/whatever" or "FUCKING LINUX" it's just a text editor. Often, they don't even install with a spell check dictionary. I guess it would fall under "whatever" but, eh, not in that context.

ETA: Just noticed they're root. I predict their next post will be FUCKING LINUX ISN'T SECURE!!!!1

[-] snorkbubs@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It was meant as a joke. Capitalism isn't feudalism in new cloths, either, but that gets a pass. I think you just hate ducks.

Besides, serfdom went on for centuries, under hundreds of different lords and rulers, in just as many environments. Your description covers one type, not all types. It's disingenuous to paint it black and white, just because you have a problem with ducks.

view more: next ›

snorkbubs

joined 1 year ago