satxdude

joined 1 year ago
[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's almost certainly way more zoophiles among the furry population, but most(?) furries aren't attracted to literal animals AFAIK. Or don't act on it. Uh

[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

It absolutely does. At least the first time.

[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The thing that gets me is the quote in the OP from last time this happened. It has been +12 hours of silence when you said last time they'd have this discussion BEFORE. Maybe it's for legal reasons but you'd think they'd have said well, something.

[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No that's not correct because the community they banned was not on their instance.

All this does is prevent Lemmy.World users from using or seeing the community. Everyone else is unaffected.

 

This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

 

This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I looked and even with safe search off Google tried damn hard not to show anything explicit. Even when I put "femboy twink bussy" nothing explicit.

[–] satxdude@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you had elementary aged children, you'd definitely not have sex with them.