saimen

Isn't that true for every (older) country though?

What about leChat?

Thats somehow so upside down philosophically. In human history we established states and gave them the monopoly of violence, so that we don't crush each others heads all the time (at least inside the state) or so that some guy who is stronger or has better weapons can't just take all our stuff because he wants to.

325% Steigerung ist multipliziert mit 4,25 (100% Steigerung ist ja schon eine Verdoppelung).

How is a nuclear meltdown not the fault of nuclear power? Of course you can prevent it by being super careful and stuff, but it is inherent to nuclear power that it is super dangerous. What is the worst that can happen with a wind turbine? It falls, that's it.

Talulah Riley seems like a keeper he couldn't keep. She also didn't just let him use her as a birthing machine.

Which one is born female?

Your source does not support your claim at all. Seems like you are projecting your scientific illiteracy onto Jung.

Which makes me worried. A country with a declining economy but the largest military in the world is almost certain to project its inner problems outwards in form of war. The best the world can hope for is another civil war inside the US.

I just wanted to point out that we humans already made life more fair. Of course it could be better and it sucks when people are mean, but at least we mostly don't just beat each other to death suddenly or dueling on the streets any more.

You list other animals as positive examples and then say yourself that our life wouldn't be like other animals.

When we were still small hunter gatherer groups, individuals who made problems or simply weren't strong enough or a bit sick would cold heartedly be left behind alone which was a death sentence for early humans sooner or later.

But how many people are willing to risk their life without immediate danger to themselves (yet)?