ruination

joined 1 year ago
[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

Does "pay for privacy" mean "pay to not be tracked on Facebook and Instagram" or "pay to not be tracked on the whole internet"? I can somewhat see a reasoning for the former, but the latter is absolutely inexcusable: Meta doesn't own the internet, and it never should be allowed to.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

Also, I'm pretty sure the argument is more about the unequal enforcement of the law. Copyright should be either enforced fairly or not at all. If AI is allowed to scrape content and regurgitate it, piracy should also be legal.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's one thing, but I think regurgitating it and claiming it as your own is a completely different thing.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Even with XWayland?

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Wait, how does Google make money off of paywalled contents?

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago

My general approach to this tends to be to identify what makes me happy in life, splurge on those, save on everything else. For example, I love computers, so I'd splurge on parts, but religiously meal prep to save on food.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Install cameras in their bedroom that streams to YouTube or Twitch 24/7. See if they really have nothing to hide.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't make sense too, like it's bad enough even if just one died.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Say it louder for the people at the back: adblock is a basic cybersecurity measurs

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 year ago

Even ignoring the surveillance aspect of ads, which I could go on a massive rant about, Google and other ad platforms themselves doesn't seem to care about harming people with malvertising and scam ads. Why should I care about their revenue?

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Same. I'd rather they not exist, but if they must, better that it isn't under big tech's grubby palms.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Technically true, but in practice, it's very vulnerable to conglomeration of power by a few. Social media, for one: it's not exactly a matter of quality to get users to use your platform. Beyond a certain threshold of minimum quality, people use and stay on a certain platform because the people they know are on it, such that it becomes a chicken and egg problem. Other than that, Google have such a ludicrous market share of web advertising (which unfortunately remains the primary method of monetising the web) that it's very difficult to not use Google's advertising, giving them immense power to surveil and monitor people. Google Chrome, which remains the most popular browser for reasons that elude me, has so much sway over the internet that it had the courage to even propose the idea of WEI. The infrastructure on which the entite internet runs are controlled by just a handful of massive ISPs, yet another centralisation of power.

 

Posted something similar on the NixOS sublemmy, but it basically boils down to the fact that I tend to switch back and forth between both distros, and I enjoy both very much as both Gentoo and NixOS provide an immense degree of control over my system and allow me to go wild and do whatever I want. But I feel the need to settle on one system and tinker with the other on a VM instead, as this switching back and forth is becoming a time sink and hindering my studies somewhat. The question is, which to use as the main desktop system? Gentoo feels more intuitive to me, but NixOS is definitely powerful at managing complex systems, but then again, I only have a simple desktop system. Another thing that I thought of is that maybe I can somewhat replicate NixOS' rollback feature, which is my absolute favourite feature of it, using a combination of Git and ZFS snapshots? I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.

 

I've heard that you should be using the appropriate stage3 archive for the profile you want to use, but what exactly are the differences between them? I'm asking this because I want to try doing a Hardened/SELinux/Musl/LLVM install, and there's a profile for that, but not the stage3 archive. I was thinking of starting with either Hardened/Musl or LLVM/Musl. Any thoughts on that?

view more: next ›