roscoe

joined 11 months ago
[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago

No one else wants to bring back anomalocaris so we can get some payback?

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, that's another one. I think that one is even worse because the new usage makes it a contranym. Dictionaries are starting to include the new usage of that one too. Unless you have a reason to be pretty sure the author/speaker knows the correct definition, it can be difficult to tell.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oooh, bison bulgogi, bison galbi, either would be good in bibimbap. I've got a couple things to try.

BTW: Yesterday I ended up going to the burger joint, but I got the bone marrow burger with a couple drams of Glenfarclas 18.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It means puzzled and/or confused.

Many authors seem to think it means amused mixed with some confusion or puzzlement or something else like that.

Some dictionaries have started to include definitions along those lines, which is correct to do if that is becoming a common usage. But that makes the word bullshit because it no longer conveys a clear meaning. Unlike some words that gain new meanings through misuse, it's usually not clear which meaning is intended from context. Usually I can easily imagine a character's response to something to be either of these definitions so I often can't understand the author's intention. I often find myself taken out of the story while I try to understand which meaning I should use. Because of this I think the word has become useless and shouldn't be used.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Bemused

It's used incorrectly so often that even when I suspect it's being used correctly I can't be sure. At this point its ambiguity makes it a bad word choice.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

All that burgerland talk is making me want a bison burger, but all the Korea talk is making me want nakji-bokkeum. Decisions, decisions...

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"A Transport For London camera study of 7,500 cyclists at five junctions found in 2007 that, contrary to popular perception, most cyclists do not run reds: 84% of the cyclists stopped at red traffic lights."

This surprised me. I haven't noticed that many cyclists running reds. The tone seemed to suggest that was a good statistic for some reason. That is way too high. If 16% of cars ran red lights my life expectancy would be about three days. I'm in favor of cyclists bending or breaking rules to protect themselves but I don't think running reds qualifies. Everyone should always stop at reds. I'm a bit of a scofflaw when it comes to some traffic laws but that's too far.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I vote for this to become official.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 47 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

What's the opposite of eating the onion? I read your comment and scoffed, wondering who could actually believe this. The I saw the "Not" in the comm name.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Absolutely, I shouldn't have used cheap as a synonym for bad, or vice versa, that's my mistake.

There are a lot of very good wines at low price points, especially from underappreciated regions. A little experimentation will result in finding some great value.

The same goes for the whiskey. There are a lot of distilleries out there with great offerings far below the price of the big names everyone recognizes. Especially when you take fads into account. Many bourbons and Japanese whiskeys that used to be good buys are now ridiculously priced.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but...are you saying you never want some shitty nachos?

view more: next ›