[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Then we shouldn't call them JRPGs.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You called it "bloated" which makes it sound you like you did not know that.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These laws are intentionally toothless. Google will eat the fines and the feds can pretend they won something.

Nothing will change until we start imprisoning executives who break the law.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Any multi platform GUI toolkit with a cross-compilable language will give you twice the functionality in half the development time over HTML+CSS+JavaScript.

Hundreds of companies have tried to solve this exact problem for years and already did the cost/benefit analysis. It turns out that writing almost all of your code exactly once is cheaper than doing it in the multiple stacks that would be required with whatever your dream architecture is. They are not idiots just because you want them to be.

You sound like someone with zero practical experience in this area who just wants to rant about code purity. The rest of us are trying to get shit done while you pine for a perfect technology stack that will never exist.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol so you're one of the devs the author is talking about. Imagine getting this worked up over a topic you clearly don't understand. "Failed technology stack" -- that's right everyone, the most widely used stack on the planet is a failure because this guy doesn't like javascript. Everyone else in the world is obviously a stupid moron for not seeing things his way.

If you program in anything other than machine code you are an idiot. Remember that next time you use a failed abstraction like C.

Can't believe this nonsense actually got upvoted. You never even identify any real issues with modern JS or HTML. It's just a bunch of run-on whining. "HTML was meant to provide a standardized way for presenting data" -- lol so literally how it's still used today.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The carriers refused to do it one their own so Google had to provide the servers themselves. Apple could do the same, but we all know they won't and never will. If it wasn't this excuse it would be another one.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We cannot allow another country to pretend they have jurisdiction in North America, that's beyond unacceptable. These enforcers absolutely need to be arrested and deported.

China won't do shit. They are just as dependent on the US/Canada, if not moreso at this point. If we allow this to continue we are essentially surrendering our sovereignty to them, while allowing them to harass and threaten our taxpayers. That is pure cowardice.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean even Solaris and the BSDs are just different flavors of Unix

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How do you "fucking go in" to an online bank? And why are you being so aggressive about a simple question? Getting tired of people still acting like redditors here.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Man, I hope the EU pulls the trigger on Google. They are way, way overdue for getting broken up. It's insane how easily they can change the entire internet on a whim with zero oversight. The Biden admin will never do it.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Do you have an article about react? I'd love to read it. And yes tech is chock full of egos and fakers.

[-] rambaroo@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Never seen it work? These faang people are totally delusional. Google keeps putting off their third party cookie retirement exactly because of outcries like this.

view more: next ›

rambaroo

joined 1 year ago