[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Which bit was bigoted? Reality?

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I assume they moved there after the first model t rolled off the production line. Over 80% of the world don't have a car, there is significant overlap with rural people in that.

As I have already said, improve infrastructure, improve public transport, get off your lazy arse and walk more then 5 seconds from your front door.

You don't say you're American but it's so obvious you are, being incapable of functioning without a car isn't normal it's kind of pathetic

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, those are the two sole options, cars and genocide. Fucking idiot. Have you heard of a bus?

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You're on a federated platform, people are talking here from across lots of different websites. They're genuinely popular though, most of the posts are human, most of the humans recently left Reddit so there's a lot of shares of favourite content.

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

No country in the EU is a totalitarian dictatorship either we've worked out busses and footpaths, it's not hard, your cities and counties still have planning offices, public servants decide these things. It makes little difference to the cost or scope of projects to design things so people can use them.

I think you're grossly underestimating how expensive dragging your heels on climate is going to be for everyone. Changing infrastructure now is cheap in comparison. Your economy is going to be fucked by climate change regardless of what china does, there is no prisoners dilemma.

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, build the damn infrastructure, now. It's not about perfect it's about working toward a minimum viable output and electric cars miss that mark.

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's not enough. Cutting transport emissions by two thirds is simply not enough. We can change planning now to make it hurt slightly less when we have to get rid of cars or we can continue the current path and leave a load of people stranded when the rug gets pulled, which do you think sounds better?

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I never said we need to be perfect, you're dismissing the argument to save your feelings.

I said we need to drive less. It's not hard, it's not perfect, and it's the centre of most European planning efforts to mitigate climate change.

Electric cars are and industry solution to an industry problem, they're not a reasonable response to climate change

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, we're seeing the same chart. Now add a bicycle, or replace 60 stupid little Tesla's with a bus.

We are not at a point where electric car ownership is a viable solution, we're at least 20 years too late. Even the manufacturing cost us too great.

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago

I don't think they want that, they have a month before they have to come back with something or you can escalate it to a supervising body. Imagine getting taken to court because redditors flooded your GDPR response process

[-] pterodactyl@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

It's not great is it? Reasonably we just need less vehicles

view more: next ›

pterodactyl

joined 1 year ago