[-] peto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

2050s for 1st edition, I think current edition is 2070s. Dragons started waking up in the early 2010s though. There has also been significant geopolitical upheaval, especially in the Americas and Europe. The general assumption is that a nuyen being about 1 modern dollar is about the right ballpark.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Shadowrun probably throws these assumptions off a bit. Dunkelzahn's net worth is hard to pin down but I think the listed cash dispursements in his will exceeded 1 billion nuyen, plus all the real estate and the establishment of several foundations, several items of extreme power and a number of 'wishes'.

Lofwyr owns a AAA megacorp that he assembled out of purchases made within about 30 years of waking up. My personal he'd cannon is that he ate Musk at some point in this process.

Even the less well known ones have serious stock portfolios and including multiple point shares in megacorps. Dragons took to business rather well as soon as they worked out what share certificates were.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 139 points 1 week ago

"Greed is not the issue here" - actual dragon sitting on literal pile of gold.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately that is more a symptom than a root cause. Even if we could the infection would remain.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

But if I don't have American politics to distract me I have to confront how generally fucked the UK is.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, this is much the same kind of use. If you work on the assumption that it is just something that has read everything, and everything that has been written about everything you can find it's utility. Folk want it to be some kind of fact genie, but the only facts it knows are what words go together, and it literally doesn't know the difference between real and made up.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

You forgot that all writing needs to be done at exactly a 33⁰ angle. they have protractors to check you know.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 66 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't the entire purpose of copilot that it shouldn't need much in the way of training? I think the extent of it at my employer is "this is the one you use."

I've tried it a few times, the only thing it seems remotely good for is when your recollection of a source is too fuzzy to form a traditional search query around. "What's that book series I read in the early 2000s about kids who traveled to another world and the things they brought back from it just looked like junk." Kind of questions.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 51 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, you know that thing you use? What if it had a button on it that opened an AI prompt?

Well my mum says it's a really smart idea from her special little innovator.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Unironically? Maybe not. But using something ironically is still using it.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 88 points 2 weeks ago

You knew it was cursed knowledge when you clicked on it. Caveat Lemmor

[-] peto@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Not whole ones, no.

view more: next ›

peto

joined 1 year ago