The vast majority of human conceptions are accidental. Stands to reason that the higher the rate of such "accidents", the more likely a group of data was to reflect a, shall we say, historical tendency? Exploited for generations, no doubt; the fact remains: it tracks.

Rightmost is shoppin'.

Came here to post exactly this. 🤣🤌🏽

Did he do something wrong?

How does that improve the slurry method above?

Would you have? No disrespect intended, it's a genuine question I earnestly implore each of us to answer to ourselves at the very least.

For variety, swap out "black" with any marginalized community of your choice: female, non-binary, undocumented alien, neurodivergent, actual human, etc.

That's literally what "instantized" means, though. 😅

If you add hot water to corn starch, you're gonna have a bad time. And clumps.

(Use cold water to make the paste, then add that to the heated liquid you want to thicken via corn starch, FYI.)

Diddy *

We're pretending that a serial pedo, self-proclaimed rapist, career fraudster, and all-around fuckclown is eligible for presidency, so why are you so fucking surprised?

Oh, the already-cracked POS? Cute, and predictable. 🤦🏽‍♂️

tl;dr: Only if we start using the rich as fertilizer, globally.