I am super excited for Ferrari but know that the race strategy will somehow fumble this fantastic qualifying for the team. I've been hurt too many times.
ooboontoo
joined 1 year ago
Congratulations to Gukesh! Anand's enduring legacy is all of the super strong GMs whose careers are just coming into focus that were inspired by his championship reign. I'm sure Anand is super proud of him and all of the others close behind. My hope is that Ding has a similar effect on China in a few years.
It was pretty entertaining. Q1 and Q2 had just enough dampness to cause issues for everyone. Albon was P1 in Q1 which as it turned out was not really a fluke as he ended up P4. There were 2 red flags throughout, Hamilton under-performing, and then Max doing what he does best at the end of Q3 in front of the home crowd.
I applaud lichess for shining a light on this important issue. Chess should be a welcoming game for everyone. There should be no place for sexist assholes.
The answer is a lot. Over 17 seconds a lap on this circuit.
Growing up I really enjoyed the Riddler episodes of the animated Batman series.
I don't think just because there's more passing automatically means more crashes. If anything the faster cars would take it easy on the first lap (when most incidents occur) knowing they have the speed to overtake once all the craziness is over.
I know everyone likes to shit on sprints, but I'm ok with the FIA experimenting if only to avoid things getting stale. My suggestion would be to run the sprint in reverse qualifying order so even back markers get to fight for some points and you could have a ton of overtakes.
It might in replying generic answers to well known question.
That's kind of the point of using the LLM to replace the person reading from the script right? Moreover, generic answers to well known questions could make up the bulk of the calls and you train the LLM to hand off to a real person if it gets stuck. The reality is the people doing that job were not adding a lot of value over what an LLM can do. So if the people are more expensive and the output is exactly the same as the LLM (or the LLM is even better as this CEO claims) the business will have to lay off the people to stay competitive.
We should be looking to retool folks that are impacted by technological advancements like this, but for some reason there is little appetite for that.
I hear you, but I can't help but feel like blockchain is a solution looking for a problem most of the time. Is it super helpful in some very narrow niches.... Sure. But go back a few years and people were saying it was going to be everywhere and clearly it's not. I think LLMs will have many more uses than blockchain ever will.
view more: next ›
What are the best deals I need to consider? Looking to treat myself to a couple of games that can sit unplayed next to the others I picked up last year.