[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Because those shareholders (billionaires) and corporations drained the consumers of all of their money and now they're the most profitable demographic to market to.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

ok. have a good day.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I was in highschool when that video went viral. Everyone knew the name Chris cocker.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

This isn't a solution because if everyone did this then those trades would be oversaturated and not worth as much anymore. We need institutional solutions that benefit everyone like making school cheaper.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I prefer no landlords at all

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

none of them maintain their properties

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It's good to have ambitions though

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago

You can see every moment a senior dev went to management and asked for time or money to develop a certain type of interaction and were told no every single time.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I stopped at "normies". Lose the ego and grow up if you want people to listen to your opinions.

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

So you think it's an inevitability? Given enough time we will develop one?

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

What's the evidence?

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

If anyone in the future ends up going to prison or losing custody of their children because they bought them a cellphone or let them use social media, we will have officially failed as a society. That is dystopian as all hell.

It is not the government's place to parent people's children for them, much less the dysfunctional government we have.

view more: next ›

omarfw

joined 3 weeks ago