npz

joined 1 year ago
[–] npz@lemm.ee 162 points 1 month ago (41 children)

Well they're still blowing up kids with these things so idk if it's the most brilliant targeting technique

[–] npz@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe in the distant pre-cloud past, when sysadmins were still a thing, you'd expect a bigger staff to be needed to manage a bigger datacenter.

But a few devs who know how to spin up a thing with auto-scaling can accomplish a lot

[–] npz@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wonder what the percent of AI datasets being propaganda is

[–] npz@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

I'm glad they're adding support, but I also feel like this is a hard one to sell to the general public. If it creates a better experience, word will get around about it, but going on stage and talking at length about how there's a new messaging protocol would have been a challenge for non-technical viewers

[–] npz@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I just read they decided to default it to off. They should remove it entirely imo, but with this move, it costs IT departments $0 and 0 hours of their time to worry about.

I think business + government + education usage is more important for them than personal, and as long as this costs them nothing, I doubt it makes a dent in anyone's plans. Could have been an apocalypse if defaulted to on though.

[–] npz@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't think Steam supports any sort of sliding scale system and they have a price parity rule which would be broken by offering it elsewhere

[–] npz@lemm.ee 55 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (18 children)

(for demonstration purposes only, please don't think I'm like this)

[–] npz@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I think these are fair points. and I can't say I blame anyone for wanting Meta/FB out of their life entirely. I see value in both options - the option of having maximum connectivity to others, and the option of having only parties that are considered to be in good ethical standing. And I'm glad the fediverse can offer both options to everyone. For me personally, having communications cut between users based on who is hosting their instance is a last resort.

[–] npz@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I don't need any sort of isolationism pushed on me. I wouldn't sign up for an email provider that blocks GMail because "we're not corpo bootlickers", or a phone provider that only lets me call the coolest fellow comrades. If an instance wants to be its own little island with its own ideology, I'm cool with that, but it's not for me - I'm looking for an instance that behaves more like an un-opinionated public utility.

[–] npz@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it shows some of the strengths of federated networks. If the owners of a small proprietary social network ghosted their project, it would take a huge effort to try to replace it, which would be insurmountable for many communities. But in this case, a community can fork onto a new server pretty quickly and seamlessly.

[–] npz@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They've raised over $80 million. Investor money is a poison, and the only antidote is enshittification.

view more: next ›