mojo_raisin

joined 1 month ago
[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What an awful thing to say.

Ngl, seeing the naivete and ignorance about what just happened is wild and entertaining.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Are people dumb enough to think our world is going to continue as it has, just keep making memes, move on? We done fucked up, there will be nothing to move on to.

Sorry for the f word insult.

You think we should just stop all industries then?

We live in a capitalist world that is exploiting the planet for profit and will continue to do so until it dies, which scientists are telling us we are coming up on.

Most of the industries of the world do not exist for the benefit of humans, they exist for the benefit of those who want to rule and hoard resources. We are brought up in a culture they control that tells us their products are important and to desire them.

Ultimately, I don't think it's ok to cause harm to living things and ecosystems to prop up this system. Like, how many people is it ok to kill so that we have cell phones? Rockets are just a particularly egregious example way of thinking, just like fashions shows are. So yes, I think if our species expects to exist in 100 years on a planet that still has forests and whales, it will require the end most industries we know today. Degrowth of some sort is the only way forward that doesn't end in disaster. Rocket use at the level of 2024 is simply not compatible with sustainability.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All industries destroying the planet are responsible including fast fashion, rockets are not allowed to harm people because "they're important". Important to what? Important to profits, important to american military and cultural hedgemony, important to innovation of more unnecessary products to sell to even further degrade the ecosystem?

No you go fanboy over fascist rocket boy.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Pointless reply, not all suffering has the same cause of course, but most of the unnecessary suffering (i.e. that suffering of all sentient beings on top that which occurs due to the nature of life itself) is caused by human activity, specifically where selfish individuals have felt entitled to cause suffering in others, destroy ecosystems, extinct species, and oppress peoples in pursuit of their goals.

The world is not ours to consume.

Like binaural beats for the eyes?

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI is the greatest accelerant of our species demise.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

If I was given the choice by a genie, on the one side you have your laptop, Lemmy, car, etc, but millions of people an animals suffer, or on the other hand, our tech evolves more slowly and sustainably, I'd choose the latter every time.

I'll take being 30 years behind and still have <insert any species we've driven extinct>. An entitlement to the lives and well being of others for the sake of "progress" is pretty sick.

[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is no solution that involves billions of people buying things.

view more: next ›