As someone who can't afford to donate, I appreciate you.
mnejing
joined 1 year ago
As someone who can't afford to donate to them, I appreciate you.
He seemed pretty happy when I was playing Hades.
My last office job, the cleaning staff would come in right as we were leaving. I dunno if it helped, but I always tried to make sure any trash in my corner was neat and they really only needed to do a quick turn over of my trash can. I don't know if that's a thing they appreciate, but I'll always do that much for them. I may not be sanitizing tables or anything, but I think making a neat and orderly pile for your cleaning staff or even a table busser is just being a decent human being.
Just worked for me. shrug
The first time I ever heard my wife's voice was on XMPP (GTalk, I know, but I was using Jabber prior to). So yes, I absolutely used XMPP and watched it get obliterated.
My utilities.
The uncertainty of the future of shows I actually enjoy means I don't bother paying for any of that crap (I'd probably consider Shudder though). I run an Emby server with a ton of storage. I'm not going to pay a company to actively crater the content I actually want to watch. I did grab a Nebula/Curiosity Stream year-long sub at Christmas because it was heavily discounted. They're likely to get more money from me, because it's primarily creator driven and more (I think) of the revenue goes to the people who deserve it.
Moreover, the bulk of the crap isn't worth spending money on anyway. If I wasn't getting it for free, I just wouldn't consume it at all. Hell, half the stuff I download just sits there until I "get around to it." That list only grows, never shrinks.
Lemming?
Ideally it's a config error at the firewall. I saw an interesting idea posed on the lemmy post suggesting that it may have been targeted by a DDoS that used kbinbot in the user-agent string.
Ultimately, it's not happening at a code level, it's absolutely happening at a firewall level (nginx, which, for those who don't understand, is kind of acting like the door lock on your apartment building, where you need to go through the main security before you can get to your own place. Sort of the same idea here). I just spent a bunch of time testing a bunch of various user-agent strings, and it very specifically is matching "kbinbot". No wildcarding within the word, but it a string like "blahbinbotblah" will 403, whereas "blahkbbinbotblah" won't (and various other forms, like k.bin.bot, or kasdfbinasdfbot.)
It's pretty specific. Anyone who deals with firewalls in any capacity understands how nginx works, and specifically why they and others are raising an alarm.
So yeah, ideally it's a misconfiguration, otherwise it's a fairly clear message.
Why is it that Billet Labs themselves haven't spoken publicly about this? At this point, the story is being told second hand. I'm not saying it's not true, I'm just saying that taking it at face value is a bit iffy considering it's coming from someone else. Maybe I missed it, and they DID say something, but I literally have to take it at face value that Steve is telling the ENTIRE story, or that he even got the ENTIRE story.
I'm not against accountability, but a lot of this could have been handled privately. Again, not taking sides here, but Steve gets most of his attention from just going after other companies, whether deserved or not. I rarely hear about GN unless there is SOME kind of controversy going on (hardware issues and him having very valid input on it, or basically company drama). I just feel like this is pointlessly dividing a community in to Team LMG vs. Team GN thing, and it's dumb.
No really, hear me out on this. Steve has said in the past he wants to be treated like he is doing journalism, and intends to hold himself to journalistic standards (he said this during the NewEgg thing). It's pretty standard when doing a story to get commentary from the party your story is about. Because journalism is, at least supposed to be, about telling the WHOLE story. Both sides. Instead, it's more of a hatchet job. There are ways to go about "calling out" a company that doesn't involve telling what is ultimately a one-sided story with the veiled challenge of "prove me wrong." That's not journalism. That's drama for views.