[-] mihies@kbin.social 11 points 3 months ago

Thank God, I was worried for a brief moment.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 3 months ago

Not much of a good radar, eh? /s
I bet the motives to strike it were multiple, such as sending Russia a message (because of nuclear drills) and financial ones - those radars have to be obscenily expensive. I bet the later was primary.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 8 points 3 months ago

More exactly on pressure.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 7 points 4 months ago

Talib government at the time asked US for evidence of Osama involvement, they would consider extradition. They didn't get any. Thinking about it, neither did we.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 2 points 4 months ago

Here, I've found an article. M CPUs are also much more integrated, like a SoC, which gives them further performance/power advantages sacrificing extensibility.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

It's not just node, it's also the design. If I remember properly, ARM has constant instruction length which helps a lot with caching. Anyway, Apple's M CPUs are still way better when it comes to perf/power ratio.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

What not fix all?

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Germany has a lot of renewable sources and it's full on building much more. You're confusing it with their dumb policy of closing nuclear power plants. They are also considering hydrogen as storage to replace coal and gas power plants during winter. Note winter, they have not much problems during summer where electricity is abundant and often has a negative price.

What does Norway being oil exporter have anything to do with this topic?

[-] mihies@kbin.social 2 points 4 months ago

At least it doesn't pollute when it burns. Hydrogen is also a decent storage capacity when you have plenty of renewable energy to store. Which is happening, just look at Norway or Germany.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

Probably it wasn't noticeable. Imagine this scenario: somebody would pay a monthly fee, would download "entire" Spotify and then forever listen to it in offline mode. And since it's offline, artists won't get payed as well.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 3 points 4 months ago

The thing is, you're buying from their record labels, not directly from artists. And then it depends on their contract how much they actually get. But they are still getting more from it, I guess.

[-] mihies@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

ve ran into the same issue I’ve had with Spotify for a while - even if I download a playlist for offline usage, it’ll still try to connect to the internet, so if I was somewhere with poor reception, it’d get stuck on a spinning circle for a minute before giving up and showing me the songs I’ve wanted to play.

That's by design and all streaming apps would do it like that to enforce abuse prevention.
Edit: added word at the end

view more: next ›

mihies

joined 1 year ago