mandelbrotvurst
This is a false equivalency. The NYT has historically been complicit in manufacturing consent for US foreign policy interests with coverage framing and agenda-setting. By choosing what stories to cover and how to cover them, they can promote certain perspectives while downplaying others. Another user in this thread already pointed out that the author of this article is a pro-Israel propagandist.
Oh look, the NYT manufacturing consent for the military industrial complex. What a surprise.
...see why kids love cinnamon toast crunch?
"""externalities"""
IANAL, but it seems to me that if the State deliberately restricts a life saving procedure they have effectively sentenced you to death without due process, violating the 14th amendment (since it's a Texas state law).
I've been very happy with duckduckgo.
Also want to submit for Android: just using YouTube in Firefox with uBO extension
ThE mArKeTpLaCe Of IdEaS