lollow88

joined 1 year ago
[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know... I feel brains are in short supply around Musk.

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You can opt out of both, but automated cold calling is straight up illegal in the UK (and it's a good thing it is).

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, then how about automated cold calling vs "live" cold calling?

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I see what you mean. Perhaps cold calling would be a better example then, where it is illegal if it is automated.

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In this context I meant that it was the same person doing a "normal" thing at such a scale that it becomes illegal. Scale absolutely is something that can turn something from legal to illegal.

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Scale makes a difference, but it shouldn't make a legal difference w.r.t. the legality of the activity.

What do you think the difference between normal internet traffic and a ddos attack is?

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't just use Capitalism to wash your hands of every amoral action. I mean... clearly you can, but you shouldn't. The fact that fair compensation is impossible is literally the reason why ai is getting (rightfully) shit on by so many people. The fact that huge vc funded corporations went "yeah we needed a lot of data, but it would have cost us way too much to get it ethically so we just swiped it" is disgusting and the reason ai should be shut down. It's so weird to me that so many anticapitalists have been enthralled by ai when they are made by huge companies that are profiting from work they stole... literally the capitalist wet dream. How exactly is that fighting against Capitalism?

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

At the end of the day, its Capitalism stealing work from artists, not the machine.

Fully agree on this.. but since we live in a capitalist system and until we don't anymore, it's still wrong.

The images are made from scratch with techniques learned from the things it trained on.

With no input (in the almost totality of cases) from the artist. None of the artists agreed to have their work being used to train the machine and if their work is being used for that they deserve to be compensated.

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why do you feel you're owed the work of people who have spent those years without compensating them or even asking for that matter? You do realise that is unsustainable right?

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Are you being paid to do research and publish it?

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm in your same position and fully agree. An UBI would be way better... but until that exists it's not right that people make use of my work for their own profit.

[–] lollow88@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Only the capitalists have access to creating stuff? You do know you can just put in the practice and get good right?

view more: next ›